Merely Point out Simply no With a National Gun Registry.

I was having a discussion with a buddy today who, although very liberal of all issues, is somewhat middle of the trail in regards to gun control. He is not against concealed carry, but does favor much more background checks – especially on sales from a private individual to private individual.

He is a bit surprised that I’m against this. “Why?”, he asked.

First, allow me to preface my reasoning with a little information regarding me. I’m no anarchist. I’m not a doomsday prepper. I do not believe we’re due for a revolution, certainly not within my lifetime. I like having SOME government (don’t tell my anti-statist friends though). All of these beliefs being so, I must admit that I do fear for the generations which come after my death (I do hope to possess at least another 40 years, which will get me into my 80s).

So back to my friend. Why do I disagree with him? Well, it’s simple. Background checks on every sale, specifically private individual to private individual, would lead to a nationwide gun registry. I’m greatly against having certainly one of these.

My friend countered, very proudly I will add, that we must register our cars. Why not our guns? This is simple. STI Firearms Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the right to keep and own cars. We all caved on the licensing of cars and drivers of a century ago.

Our founding fathers specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to keep and bear arms. You can find different interpretations in regards to what they meant, but I believe at least part of these reasoning was so that we could protect ourselves from the tyrannical government or those that wish to complete us harm.

Do I believe which our government is tyrannical? Well, not quite yet. We are still the most free nation on earth. I do nothing like to path our country is on, but I do not feel it’s to late to right the ship.

Having a national gun registry would lead to forced gun buy-backs or even confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or man-made). Having our abilities to guard ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in a database could be sharing information that is way too personal.

The trail to hell is paved with good intentions. Government is great at making us genuinely believe that being safer (their definition) is well worth quitting a couple of rights. Forcing people everywhere to join up their private, constitutionally protected guns is just a bad idea.

I will foresee that guns would even get linked with addresses where their owners no longer live. What if you moved into a home where the previous occupants had a number of guns registered and the authorities came trying to find those folks? We all understand that police, most of them being great people, do make mistakes when their adrenaline levels are too high. Would you want your house getting shot up because the previous residents had guns listed in the registry?

During a so-called “state of emergency” you are able to bet some local, state or national governments would make a proceed to take any weapons that didn’t reside in the hands of government personnel. It has happened. Start to see the video below.

I still find it none of the government’s business if I own a weapon (or guns). Yes, I need to do the same background check as other people when I buy a new gun. But do you think that having a national registry would keep guns out of the hands of individuals who could not pass a background check? Not a chance. I believe you’d see a lot of gun owners reporting their guns stolen to be able to sell their guns to whomever they desire – in the same way they can now.

When times get bad, whose doors are agents of the us government (police or military ) planning to be knocking down when they’re going on the gun collection binges? I’ll inform you – the door’s which are on the addresses included in the gun registry.

While we do not currently have a government that kicks in doors and gives gas showers or firing squads to people they cannot like, we do not know very well what our government will appear like in 50 or 100 years. I’d like my children and grandchildren to manage to defend themselves from both a tyrannical government or even a homicidal maniac (I suppose they are often one and the same though).

Starting a national gun registry is the first step to taking guns from people the us government does not want possessing guns. Currently this type of person felons and individuals with mental problems. Who might these future gunless people be? People of particular political parties? People of certain economic classes? People of certain religions? It’s all happened throughout world history. We pretend to function as the enlightened Americans but we have factions that are looking to take all our freedoms and give all the power to the us government the same as dictators of past and present we have all heard of.

So how exactly does this happen? We’ve to consider it from two avenues. First the gradual lack of gun rights for everybody through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the entire lack of gun rights for specific groups of people the us government has targeted. Imagine a candle burning at both ends. As one end burns, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to possess guns. As one other end burns, more and more of the general population are receiving the rest of these gun rights recinded as well. When the flames meet in the middle we’re left without any guns for everyone, and we have a government with nothing to fear. That’s the nightmare of the slippery slope.

Leave a Reply